Text revised on 17 October 2026 to clarify the scope of sources and review.
A text can sound convincing and still contain errors. That’s why caring for Mitosk’s content takes more than generating an explanation that reads well.
A reference is not a guarantee
Academic catalogues, search engines and openly available sources can help locate information. Finding a publication, however, doesn’t mean that every claim based on it is correct or that all content has undergone peer review.
The available sources and their usefulness vary with the topic, coverage and generation process. We don’t present a connection to a provider as a guarantee that each exercise is current, rigorous or reviewed.
Context and explanation matter
We want concepts to be presented clearly: what they mean, how they relate to one another and where they apply. A simplification can help you get started, but it also needs to preserve the meaning of the original idea.
Editorial review of the official catalogue aims to identify problems such as ambiguous explanations, inconsistent answers or examples that don’t fit the question. This is work we’re continuing to develop, rather than an automatic approval of every existing world.
AI makes mistakes too
Artificial intelligence is involved in creating content and can make mistakes, miss nuances or suggest incorrect connections. A source’s quality does not, on its own, remove those risks.
Mitosk is designed for culture and learning. Its content does not replace professional advice and should not be your only reference when making important decisions.
Improving is part of the journey
Our commitment is to keep reviewing and correcting what we find. We would rather explain the process’s limits than promise perfect content or results we cannot demonstrate.
Learning also means asking another question, checking an explanation and being willing to change your mind.